Jordanian Travel Agencies' Websites Assessment: Experts vs Tourists' Perceptions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By using importance-performance analysis (IPA), this paper examines the perceptions of tourists as websites users, and experts of Internet applications, of various tourism services attribute in the Jordanian travel agencies' websites. IPA is a feasible approach to the assessment of clients' satisfaction which allows for an easy and practical understanding of both the strengths and weaknesses, and for developing areas of a given service. While, IPA Analysis as a practical methodology has been used to determine customers' perceptions and satisfaction in different fields and subjects, to the best of the author knowledge, this is the first time for this methodology has been used to compare the perceptions of tourists and experts of Internet technology in order to assess the effectiveness of travel agencies websites. The main findings determined differences between tourists' perceptions of importance and experts' evaluation of Performance about JTAs websites, majorly in categories of marketing, functionality, interaction and basic information. The study also demonstrates the effectiveness of IPA model as a strategic tool at the marketers' hand, to identify priorities for areas of development and improvement by select how to increase their capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".