Images in vascular medicine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection is a rare complication of major trauma,1,2 typically presenting soon after injury with symptoms of major stroke.3 ICA dissections also occur following minor trauma, and may present with more trivial symptoms, typically headache associated with focal neurological signs. The classic triad of Horner’s syndrome and pain, followed by cerebral or retinal ischaemic symptoms, is present in only about 20% of patients with ICA dissection.4 In cases of major trauma, disruption of the ICA is often present on initial trauma CT scanning, or becomes apparent early following the development of symptoms suggestive of cerebral ischaemia or infarction reflecting disruption of the ICA. It appears to be much less common for ICA dissection to present with focal neurological signs late following major trauma, as in the case outlined below. A previously well 36-year-old motorcyclist was thrown from his bike into a passing car, sustaining multiple leftsided long bone and pelvic fractures which required extensive ortho-plastic reconstruction and a prolonged stay on the intensive care unit. Two left neck lacerations were explored surgically at initial presentation; the carotid sheath was intact. As the patient recovered he reported some visual loss in the left eye. Clinical examination revealed a Panel A
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it