MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135245107 · doi:10.1112/s0024611505015479

Galois Module Structure of <i>p</i>Th‐Power Classes of Cyclic Extensions of Degree <i>p</i><sup>n</sup>

2006· article· en· W2135245107 on OpenAlexaff
Ján Mináč, Andrew Schultz, John Swallow

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDegree (music)Galois groupBase (topology)Galois moduleField (mathematics)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mid‐1960s Borevic and Faddeev initiated the study of the Galois module structure of groups of p th‐power classes of cyclic extensions K/F of p th‐power degree. They determined the structure of these modules in the case when F is a local field. In this paper we determine these Galois modules for all base fields F . 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 12F10 (primary), 16D70 (secondary)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207