Simultaneous process synthesis and control design under uncertainty: A worst‐case performance approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new methodology that includes process synthesis and control structure decisions for the optimal process and control design of dynamic systems under uncertainty is presented. The method integrates dynamic flexibility and dynamic feasibility in a single optimization formulation, thus, reducing the costs to assess the optimal design. A robust stability test is also included in the proposed method to ensure that the optimal design is stable in the presence of magnitude‐bounded perturbations. Since disturbances are treated as stochastic time‐discrete unmeasured inputs, the optimal process synthesis and control design specified by this method remains feasible and stable in the presence of the most critical realizations in the disturbances. The proposed methodology has been applied to simultaneously design and control a system of CSTRs and a ternary distillation column. A study on the computational costs associated with this method is presented and compared to that required by a dynamic optimization‐based scheme. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 59: 2497–2514, 2013
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it