MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135267371 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2003.813610

P -γ characteristics for the unified power flow controller-analysis inclusive of equipment ratings and line limits

2003· article· en· W2135267371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnified power flow controllerOperating pointEngineeringElectric power transmissionTransmission lineElectric power systemPower flowLimit (mathematics)VoltageControl theory (sociology)Transmission systemShunt (medical)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Transmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceControl (management)PhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a direct and systematic method for determining the entire operating range of a UPFC in the presence of equipment and system operating limits. The method is inclusive of all limits: series converter voltage and current limits, shunt converter current limit, and voltage limits at the equipment terminals. The formulation is general and permits calculation of P-/spl delta/ curves for a UPFC installed at any point along the transmission line. Equipment and system operating limits are shown to significantly impact the P-/spl delta/ curves of the UPFC. The methodology presented in the paper provides system planners a means to realistically quantify potential benefits of a UPFC installation for a transmission system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it