Repenser le plurilinguisme : langue, postnationalisme et la nouvelle économie mondialisée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il est devenu difficile aujourd’hui de maintenir la fiction de l’homogénéité et les marchés nationaux protégés issus du nationalisme moderne. L’expansion capitaliste force à s’ajuster à de nouvelles réalités bien identifiées par nombre d’auteurs importants : l’expansion des marchés et la recherche de ressources; la saturation des marchés et la nécessité de se concentrer sur la valeur ajoutée, les produits de niche, la spécialisation, la distinction; l’augmentation et la diversification des mouvements migratoires et des réseaux de communication et de circulation des biens; et l’émergence de la nouvelle économie mondialisée basée sur les services et sur l’information, qui favorise les formes de travail basées sur la communication, avec une commodification de la langue (Heller, 2003). Ces processus nous amènent à repenser les discours reliant langue, culture, identité et citoyenneté. Les liens transnationaux rendent le plurilinguisme plus attirant. Dans la sphère politique, on travaille à développer un nationalisme inclusif et respectueux de la diversité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".