MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135337999 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021117

Elemental abundance analyses with DAO spectrograms

2002· article· en· W2135337999 on OpenAlexaff
H. Caliskan, Saul J. Adelman, M. T. Cay, İpek H. Çay, A. F. Gulliver, G. H. Tektunali, D. Koçer, Başak Akadam-Teker

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityDominion Astrophysical ObservatoryHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryCitadel Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStarsSpectrogramAstronomyAbundance (ecology)Spectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elemental abundances analyses of the superfically normal stars γ Ser (F6 V) and 101 Herculis (A7 V) consistent with previous studies of this series using photographic region spectrograms obtained with Reticon and CCD detectors produced derived values that are generally solar except for Al which is very underabundant and the rare earths which do not have the solar pattern. Similar discrepancies from solar values are seen in other superficially normal stars of this series with similar temperatures. Our results for γ Ser are in acceptable agreement with other recent studies based on different techniques and spectral regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesFrench-language works237,207