Modeling and simulation of photonic devices by generalized space mapping technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The generalized space mapping (GSM) technique is employed for modeling and simulation of photonic devices. The mapping is established between the parameter spaces of coarse and fine models so that accuracy of the coarse model is significantly improved for a given range of parameters. To demonstrate the usefulness of this technique, modeling and simulation of an optical waveguide facet is used as an application example. Two methods are adopted for the coarse model, i.e., the transfer matrix method (TMM) and the free space radiation mode (FSRM) method. The time-intensive and accurate finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is used as the fine model for model calibration. The mapping-enhanced coarse models show significant improvement in terms of accuracy. Further, a criterion is established to measure the accuracy of the coarse models. It is shown that the FSRM is one order of magnitude more accurate than the TMM for the TE case, however, the two methods have almost the same level of accuracy for the TM case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it