MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135379750 · doi:10.1109/icc.2005.1494425

Identifying a class of multiple shift complementary sequences in the second order cosets of the first order Reed-Muller codes

2005· article· en· W2135379750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinary Golay codeComplementary sequencesCosetReed–Muller codeMathematicsTernary Golay codeCode (set theory)Class (philosophy)Order (exchange)Block codeDiscrete mathematicsENCODEAlgorithmArithmeticCombinatoricsComputer scienceDecoding methodsLinear codeArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple-shift complementary sequences (MCS), a generalized form of Golay complementary sequences, have recently been introduced to encode OFDM signals, allowing a better trade-off between the code rate and peak-to-mean envelope power ratio (PMEPR). However, a table of such sequences needs to be constructed by exhaustive search, a practically impossible task for a moderately large number of sub-carriers. As has been done for Golay complementary sequences and generalized Golay complementary sequences, this paper successfully identifies a class of MCS as the second order cosets of the first order Reed-Muller codes. We also present a new proof for the PMEPR of MCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207