Paste Extrusion of Polytetrafluoroethylene: Temperature, Blending and Processing Aid Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Blends of different PTFE fine powder resins have been prepared and extruded in an attempt of improving the PTFE paste extrusion process and/or the extrudates. The extrusion pressure and the mechanical properties of the extrudates were found to fall between those exhibited by the pure components. While this is an expectable behavior, it offers opportunities for controlling the degree of fibrillation needed in the final products by mixing highly fibrillated with low fibrillated PTFE resins. Boron nitride and organically modified montmorillonite clays (solid lubricants) are also tested as additives to the lubricants used in the PTFE paste extrusion in order to identify enhanced processing aids. It was found that the addition of boron nitride and clays increase the extrusion pressure but at the same time improve the mechanical properties of the final extrudates in most cases. This again offers possibilities for controlling the final mechanical properties by controlling the degree of fibrillation, i. e., by adding a small amount of solid lubricants to adjust pressure, fibrillation, and thus the final mechanical properties. Finally, it is shown that fibrillation depends on temperature. Moreover, the mechanical properties of extrudates increase as the temperature goes through its two transition temperatures of 19 °C and 30 °C that render PTFE particles more deformable and prone to fibrillation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".