Water in low-mass star-forming regions with<i>Herschel</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Water In Star-forming regions with <i>Herschel<i/>” (WISH) is a key programme dedicated to studying the role of water and related species during the star-formation process and constraining the physical and chemical properties of young stellar objects. The Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared (HIFI) on the <i>Herschel<i/> Space Observatory observed three deeply embedded protostars in the low-mass star-forming region NGC 1333 in several H<sub>2<sub/><sup>16<sup/>O, H<sub>2<sub/><sup>18<sup/>O, and CO transitions. Line profiles are resolved for five H<sub>2<sub/><sup>16<sup/>O transitions in each source, revealing them to be surprisingly complex. The line profiles are decomposed into broad (<i>><i/>20 km s<sup>-1<sup/>), medium-broad (~5-10 km s<sup>-1<sup/>), and narrow (<i><<i/>5 km s<sup>-1<sup/>) components. The H<sub>2<sub/><sup>18<sup/>O emission is only detected in broad 1<sub>10<sub/>–1<sub>01<sub/> lines (<i>><i/>20 km s<sup>-1<sup/>), indicating that its physical origin is the same as for the broad H<sub>2<sub/><sup>16<sup/>O component. In one of the sources, IRAS4A, an inverse P Cygni profile is observed, a clear sign of infall in the envelope. From the line profiles alone, it is clear that the bulk of emission arises from shocks, both on small (1000 AU) and large scales along the outflow cavity walls (~10 000 AU). The H<sub>2<sub/>O line profiles are compared to CO line profiles to constrain the H<sub>2<sub/>O abundance as a function of velocity within these shocked regions. The H<sub>2<sub/>O/CO abundance ratios are measured to be in the range of ~0.1-1, corresponding to H<sub>2<sub/>O abundances of ~10<sup>-5<sup/>–10<sup>-4<sup/> with respect to H<sub>2<sub/>. Approximately 5–10% of the gas is hot enough for all oxygen to be driven into water in warm post-shock gas, mostly at high velocities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".