MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Innovative Food and Its Effects toward Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Fast Food Product

2011· article· en· W2135395516 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin, Abdul Sabur Bin Ismail, Suhardi Wan Mansor, Shamsul Jamel Elias, Muna Abdul Jalil, Maznah Wan Omar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategies and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)MarketingScope (computer science)BusinessTastePsychologyComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This study is about the discoveries on innovative food and its effects toward consumers’ purchase intention of fast food products in Malaysia. The research aims to investigate whether consumers really consider the innovation factor when making decision to purchase the fast food products. The findings of the study indicated that there is less influence of innovative food on the consumers’ purchase intention which emphasizes more on the ‘output’ (which is the end products) rather than ‘input’ (which is raw materials used in producing the foods). Innovative food is being too narrowly defined by the consumers’ as only a technology-related part of innovations. Whereas innovative food could be perceived in a broader scope such as product innovation, process innovation, organizational innovation and market innovation. The result has shown some differences with the previous literature where food innovativeness were found to have positive relationship toward the consumers’ satisfaction. Hence, this study is expected to contribute to the existing knowledge on the dimension of consumer purchase intention to the industry players as well as academicians. Future research should focus on the similar study with the extended scope to other fast food restaurants in Malaysia. By doing this, hopefully we can get a clearer picture on the existing and new variables which can be further examined. Key words: Innovative Food; Freshness; Presentation; Taste; Fast Food RestaurantResume: Cette etude porte sur les decouvertes concernant les denrees alimentaires innovantes et de ses effets a l'intention d’achats des consommateurs sur les produits de restauration rapide en Malaisie. La recherche vise a determiner si les consommateurs ont vraiment considerer le facteur de l'innovation lors de la decision d'achat des produits de restauration rapide. Les conclusions de l'etude indiquent qu'il y a moins d'influence de la nourriture innovantes sur l’'intention d' achat des consommateurs qui met l'accent plus sur la «production» (ce qui est produit fini) plutot que «input» (ce qui est de matiere premiere utilisee dans la production des aliments ). Les alimentaires innovants sont trop etroitement definie par les consommateurs car seule une partie de technologie lies a des innovations. Considerant que les aliments innovants pourrait etre percue dans un plus large champ d'application tels que l'innovation produit, innovation de processus, l'innovation organisationnelle et innovation sur le marche. Le resultat a montre quelques differences avec la litterature anterieure, ou l'innovation alimentaire a ete trouvee a avoir des relations positives a l'egard de la satisfaction des consommateurs. Ainsi, cette etude devrait contribuer aux connaissances existantes sur la dimension de l'intention d'achat des consommateurs pour les joueurs de l'industrie ainsi que des universitaires. Les recherches futures devraient se concentrer sur l'etude similaire avec le champ d'application etendu a d'autres restauration rapide en Malaisie. En faisant cela, j'espere que nous pourrons obtenir une image plus claire sur les nouveaux et les variables existantes qui peuvent etre examinees plus avant. Mots cles: Aliments innovants; Fraicheur; Presentation; Gout; Restauration rapide

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicBusiness Strategies and InnovationFrench-language works237,207