MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135418421 · doi:10.1139/v04-076

Temporal evolution of an ultrathin, noncrystalline ice deposit at crystallization near 160 K studied by FT-IR reflection-absorption spectroscopy

2004· article· en· W2135418421 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
S. Mitlin, K. T. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrystallizationChemistryAbsorption spectroscopySpectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Reflection (computer programming)Infrared spectroscopyCrystallographyAnnealing (glass)Chemical physicsThermodynamicsOpticsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporal evolution of the OH stretching modes of a noncrystalline ice deposit upon annealing followed by crystallization near 160 K has been investigated by FT-IR reflection–absorption spectroscopy. Using the earlier theoretical results from Whalley (E. Whalley. Can. J. Chem. 55, 3429 (1977)) and from Buch and Devlin (V. Buch and J.P. Devlin. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3437 (1999)), the most prominent changes in these modes have been characterized for the first time. A dynamical picture of the structural transformation during crystallization has been developed, and it supports the observation that crystallization proceeds directly from a noncrystalline to a crystalline state without any long-lived intermediate state structurally different from its noncrystalline predecessor.Key words: crystallization, noncrystalline ice, FT-IR reflection–absorption spectroscopy, temporary evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207