MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135420268 · doi:10.1109/grc.2007.40

Naïve Bayes Text Classifier

2007· article· en· W2135420268 on OpenAlexaff
Haiyi Zhang, Di Li

Bibliographic record

Venue2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaive Bayes classifierComputer scienceBayes' theoremSupport vector machineArtificial intelligenceMachine learningDetectorClassifier (UML)Bayesian probabilityInformation retrievalData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Text classification algorithms, such SVM, and Naïve Bayes, have been developed to build up search engines and construct spam email filters. As a simple yet powerful sample of Bayesian Theorem, Naïve Bayes shows advantages in text classification yielding satisfactory results. In this paper, a spam email detector is developed using Naïve Bayes algorithm. We use pre-classified emails (priory knowledge) to train the spam email detector. With the model generated from the training step, the detector is able to decide whether an email is a spam email or an ordinary email.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)Same topicText and Document Classification TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207