MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135432043 · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e32832f078d

Center–surround organization of face-space: evidence from contrast-based face-priming

2009· article· en· W2135432043 on OpenAlexaff
Shabnam Rostamirad, Jason J.S. Barton, İpek Oruç

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFace Recognition and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Contrast (vision)NeurosciencePsychologyPriming (agriculture)Face perceptionSpace (punctuation)CommunicationComputer visionPerceptionBiologyComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

'Face-space' is an abstract concept of the multidimensional representation of faces. Faces of similar appearance are closer in face-space than dissimilar faces; however, it is not clear how representations interact. Examining contrast thresholds for facial recognition, we show that a 200 ms preview of a face facilitates recognition of the same face, but inhibits recognition of other faces, more so for the same ethnic group than for a different ethnic group. This suggests a center-surround organization in which facial representations close to the priming stimulus are more suppressed than those that are distant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicFace Recognition and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207