Bibliographic record
Abstract
Henrik Ibsen, filmmaker. A pause is necessary after that particular juxtaposition, if only to sort out the immediate clash of impressions: Ibsen, the culminating nineteenth-century dramatist, on the one hand; film, the nascent twentieth-century popular visual medium, on the other. Ibsen’s plays, among the most renowned dramas of entrapment, interiority, and inertia, do not resonate easily with the spatial–temporal mobility of the cinema. The fact that Ibsen was no Eisenstein evokes little surprise; other writers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries had a much more visible interest in the new medium (Maxim Gorky and Franz Kafka come to mind).1 Ibsen, sixty-eight years old at the time of the cinematograph’s debut in Paris, lived out most of his creative life before regular public cinematic projection became a truly viable possibility in the early twentieth century and before film could possibly have a significant cultural impact. Given that Ibsen was incapacitated by the series of strokes in 1900–03 that put an end to his writing and led to his death in 1906, he simply did not have the historical opportunity to explore the formal possibilities of the new medium directly. Case closed?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".