MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135496633 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2002.1012975

Mobile agent network management system performance study in frame relay network

2003· article· en· W2135496633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Agent-Based Network Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork management stationComputer networkFrame RelayNetwork management applicationFrame (networking)Network managementMobile agentSimple Network Management ProtocolElement management systemDistributed computingRelayBandwidth managementNetwork monitoringNetwork simulationNetwork architectureNetwork topologyBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper illustrates the results of a research effort to apply mobile agent technology in network management for the frame relay network The paper implemented a Java based mobile agent network management approach in the frame relay network by using Teema, a unique agent execution platform. The agent network management performance is simulated in a number of scenarios. It is then contrasted with the SNMP client-server paradigm. The bandwidth expenditure and cost in each scenario is compared and contrasted to the client-server paradigm. The results in the paper suggest that mobile agent technology is well suited to address some client-server management paradigm limitations on frame relay network topology and that the agents have better performance in a series of cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Agent-Based Network ManagementFrench-language works237,207