Packet Scheduling and Fairness for Multiuser MIMO Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the network resource allocation in multiuser downlink wireless systems where the base station and the mobile stations are equipped with multiple antennas to provide fair and efficient transmission services to the mobile users. We focus on packet scheduling, given that it has a significant impact on the overall performance of a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) system. Most previous schedulers designed at the packet level do not take into account the traffic characteristics (different packet lengths and the arrival process parameters); consequently, they fall short of simultaneously providing fairness and a low average packet transmission delay. We are making use of a flexible packet transmission algorithm at the medium access control (MAC) layer to develop and propose a novel scheduler, which is referred to as MIMO packet-based proportional fairness (MP-PF). The new scheduler is designed with the goal of providing high performance in terms of a low average packet transmission delay and time and service fairness among the users based on the concept of proportional fairness. The scheduler also conserves work and takes into consideration the packet length, the user queue length, the user transmission rate (related to its channel quality), and the service guarantees for heterogeneous users. The well-known ideal service fair scheduler called max-min can also significantly be improved using our framework by taking into consideration the traffic characteristics. We also provide an analysis for the fairness of the new scheduler in terms of time and service allocation, which is the key contribution of this paper. Simulations that consider the traffic characteristics and the mobility of users show the relatively low average packet transmission delay and demonstrate the time and service fairness capabilities of MP-PF, compared with other well-known MIMO schedulers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".