Feed Restriction and Insulin Treatment Affect Subsequent Luteal Function in the Immediate Postovulatory Period in Pigs: Progesterone Production In Vitro and Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression for Key Steroidogenic Enzymes1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Progesterone production and release in vitro, and mRNA expression for key steroidogenic enzymes, were studied in luteal tissue recovered in the immediate postovulatory period from cyclic gilts allocated to one of three treatments: moderate feed restriction during the first (RH) or second week of the estrous cycle, with (HR+I) or without (HR) concomitant injections of long-acting insulin. Time of feed restriction affected neither progesterone production or release, nor mRNA expression for several key steroidogenic enzymes. However, luteal tissue from RH but not from HR gilts responded to LH stimulation by increasing progesterone production and release (P: < 0.05). Insulin treatment increased progesterone production and release, restored luteal tissue responsiveness to LH, up-regulated steroidogenic enzyme mRNA expression, and down-regulated the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-I mRNA expression in HR+I compared with HR gilts (P: < 0.05). In vitro progesterone production and gene expression were affected by time of tissue collection after ovulation in RH and HR gilts but not in HR+I gilts, and were correlated with temporal changes in oviductal and peripheral plasma progesterone concentrations. Inherent differences in luteal function therefore appear to mediate latent effects of nutrition and insulin treatment on circulating progesterone concentrations in the critical postovulatory period in gilts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".