Phagocytosis and Protein Processing Are Required for Presentation of<i>Cryptococcus neoformans</i>Mitogen to T Lymphocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to eliciting antigen specific T-cell-mediated immunity, Cryptococcus neoformans possesses a mitogen (CnM) that activates naive T cells to proliferate. This mechanism of T-cell activation is accessory cell dependent and major histocompatibility complex unrestricted. CnM-induced T-cell proliferation correlates with internalization of the organism, suggesting that intracellular processing is required to liberate CnM prior to presentation to T cells. To determine whether phagocytosis and processing are required, various inhibitors of accessory cell uptake and processing were used. C. neoformans was observed within the accessory cells. Paraformaldehyde fixation of the accessory cell abrogated presentation of CnM to T cells, indicating that a dynamic accessory cell surface was required. A lysosomotropic agent abrogated the response to CnM but had no effect on a control stimulus that did not require processing. Both aspartic acid and cysteine protease inhibitors blocked effective processing of CnM, so that it was unable to stimulate T cells. Finally, an inhibitor of microfilament polymerization abrogated proliferation to CnM. These results indicate that the mitogenic activity of C. neoformans requires phagocytosis of the organism, lysosomal or endosomal processing, proteolytic activity, and microfilament polymerization and intracellular transport as a prerequisite for T-cell proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".