MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135591994 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2005.1496736

A New Wavelet-based Method-for Despeckling SAR Images

2005· article· en· W2135591994 on OpenAlexaff
M. I. H. Bhuiyan, Muneer Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarSpeckle patternSpeckle noiseWaveletArtificial intelligenceNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceWavelet transformComputer visionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Radar imagingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMathematicsImage (mathematics)RadarTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a wavelet-based despeckling method is proposed for suppressing speckle noise in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. A new threshold is proposed to classify the wavelet coefficients into significant and insignificant ones. Local statistic in the wavelet domain is used to further classify the significant coefficients into the edge and non-edge coefficients. The edge coefficients remain unaltered, whereas the non-edge and the insignificant ones are reduced in magnitude. Experiments are carried out on a noise-free image corrupted with simulated speckle noise, and a real SAR image. The results show that the proposed method provides a performance better than that of other methods in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio and ability to suppress speckle in the homogeneous areas. In addition, it introduces a bias that is much smaller than that of the other methods as well as preserves edges quite well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207