MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135613592 · doi:10.1149/2.063112jes

Corrosion Assessment of Lead Anodes in Nickel Electrowinning

2011· article· en· W2135613592 on OpenAlexafffund
Farzad Mohammadi, Matthew Tunnicliffe, Akram Alfantazi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrowinningAnodeOverpotentialCorrosionMaterials scienceMetallurgySulfuric acidNickelElectrodeLead dioxideElectrochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to their insolubility, lead and its alloys have always been candidates for anodes in electrowinning plants. However, corrosion problems associated with lead anodes cost millions of dollars for industries annually. Cast and rolled lead-silver and lead-calcium anodes were tested under typical nickel electrowinning conditions. Effects of sulfuric acid and chloride concentrations on overall corrosion performance of the anode materials were investigated. Moreover, oxygen evolution reaction rate and overpotential were determined for specific electrode material/solution conditions. Galvanostatic experiments were performed so the actual conditions that the electrodes are exposed to were simulated. Corrosion rates of the electrodes were calculated using the discharge plateau recorded during OCP measurements following the galvanostatic experiments. SEM and XRD were used to study the correlation between the surface morphology of the electrodes, their phase composition and their corrosion rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrodeposition and Electroless CoatingsFrench-language works237,207