Gastrin, somatostatin and infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Despite multiple and often contradictory research, no firm conclusions regarding the role of hypergastrinaemia in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) have been established. Evaluation of somatostatin, the main physiological antagonist of gastrin, has not been assessed in previous studies. Long-term evaluation following pyloromyotomy suggests persistent abnormalities in gastrin and somatostatin in IHPS. The objective of this case-controlled study was to compare fasting serum gastrin and somatostatin levels in IHPS. Serum sample were collected from 39 children with IHPS at the time of pyloromyotomy and 20 age-matched controls with no evidence of gastrointestinal disease. Standard radioimmunoassay techniques were used to detect circulating levels of the hormones. A two-tailed t-test was used for statistical analysis. The levels of the two hormones (mean +/- SEM) revealed that there was no evidence of hypergastrinaemia in IHPS compared with controls (75.6 +/- 16.1 and 68.1 +/- 7.8 ng l(-1), respectively), but that the level of somatostatin was significantly elevated (38.9 +/- 6.4 and 30.5 +/- 5.8 ng l(-1), p = 0.016). An inverse trend in the gastrin/somatostatin levels could not be identified in IHPS. CONCLUSION: Somatostatin but not gastrin is raised in IHPS. Somatostatin is known to inhibit the actions of inhibitory neurotransmitters in the pylorus and may explain the development of pylorospasm, which is believed to be important in the development of pyloric tumours. These results do not agree with a previous long-term follow-up study, but reflect the hormonal imbalance at the time of pyloric hypertrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".