Serial Estimates of Serum Permeability Activity and Clinical Correlates in Patients with Native Kidney Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A serum or plasma factor in certain patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has been found to increase glomerular albumin permeability (P(alb)) and causes proteinuria in experimental animals. High P(alb) is associated with recurrence of FSGS after transplantation, but serial studies of P(alb) activity in patients with native kidney FSGS have not been performed, and the relationship between P(alb) and remission of proteinuria is not known. This study was designed to determine P(alb) activity before, during, and after 24 wk of treatment with cyclosporine or placebo given as part of a randomized controlled trial in steroid-resistant FSGS patients with nephrotic range proteinuria. Pretreatment P(alb) averaged 0.36 +/- 0.22 and was not significantly different between treatment groups and was not altered during or after the test medication. There was no association between P(alb) activity and remission or relapse in proteinuria. The average P(alb) activity in native kidney FSGS was lower than in previously reported patients with posttransplant recurrence of the disease, and its level did not vary during the course of the study. The antiproteinuric effect of cyclosporine appeared independent of changes in P(alb). This finding is consistent with a direct effect of cyclosporine on glomerular barrier function and/or that within this group of patients the variations in proteinuria are not reflected in changes in Palb because of its limits in terms of reproducibility and responsiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".