MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135648181 · doi:10.1109/scac.1995.523652

Dynamic routing for multimedia traffic over ATM networks

2002· article· en· W2135648181 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Zhu, Changming Liu, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkStatic routingPolicy-based routingDynamic Source RoutingLink-state routing protocolHierarchical routingDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Multipath routingRouting tableTestbedRouting protocolDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ATM networks support multimedia traffic where diverse services have to be provided and various QoS requirements have to be met. Routing plays an important role in guaranteeing the QoS. However conventional routing will cause a significant overhead when the network size gets very large or rerouting occurs frequently due to the varying link state. The objective of our dynamic routing scheme is to perform more efficient routing over a more effective and simpler topology which is abstracted from the original full topology based on the dynamic link state. Only those links with high probability to satisfy the QoS of the call are included in the effective topology. It is an efficient way to prevent rerouting from occurring too often because the blocking probability over this effective topology is significantly low. A hierarchical routing model is also proposed to further reduce the amount of information that has to be stored and exchanged for routing. We present the simulation results of our dynamic routing scheme along with the hierarchical routing model and its implementation over QUARTS, a simulation testbed for ATM networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207