MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135657058 · doi:10.1139/b05-092

A newly described plant disease complex involving two distinct viruses in a native Alaskan lily,<i>Streptopus amplexifolius</i>

2005· article· en· W2135657058 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N. L. Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChenopodiumPotyvirusVirologyPotyviridaePlant virusBotanyGenusVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The etiology of a previously unknown disease of Streptopus amplexifolius (L.) DC. (twisted stalk) that occurred in south central Alaska was elucidated. Symptomatic plants with yellow-green dashes and streaks on their leaves contained distinct viruses belonging to the family Potyviridae and (or) tentatively to the family Flexiviridae genus Carlavirus . Each virus’ identity was confirmed by a combination of morphology, serology (ELISA and (or) Western analysis), and sequences obtained from reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction products previously generated by potyvirus- or carlavirus-specific primers. The mechanical transmission of particles (purified from twisted stalk as a mixture of both viruses or as a single preparation of each virus) to S. amplexifolius, Chenopodium amaranticolor Coste et Reyn, and Chenopodium quinoa Willd., fulfilled Koch’s postulates. The relatively high incidence of infected plants and associated severe symptoms in populations from several sites in south central Alaska gave evidence that native plants are susceptible to, and are adversely affected by viral diseases. Even though Streptopus species grow throughout the temperate regions of the world, this is the first report of a pathogen(s) infecting plants in the genus Streptopus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207