MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135680629 · doi:10.1177/1073858402008003014

The Globus Pallidus, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Parkinson's Disease

2002· review· en· W2135680629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neuroscientist · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubthalamic nucleusDeep brain stimulationGlobus pallidusNeurosciencePallidotomySubstantia nigraBasal gangliaDopaminergicStimulationParkinson's diseasePsychologyMedicineDopamineCentral nervous systemDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) is caused by the degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Loss of dopaminergic innervation leads to hyperactivity in the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), the main output nucleus of the basal ganglia and to a profound disturbance in the function of motor circuits. Lesions of the GPi (or in its upstream modulator, the subthalamic nucleus) can greatly improve the motor symptoms of PD presumably by reducing this pathological activity. Paradoxically, high-frequency electrical stimulation of the GPi (deep brain stimulation, DBS) mimics the effects of pallidotomy and has become an accepted therapeutic technique. The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of pallidal DBS are not known. Various mechanisms that might account for inhibiting or disrupting the pathological pallidal outflow by high-frequency DBS have been proposed ranging from depolarization block to stimulation-evoked release of GABA, and these are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it