Back Amorphous-Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction (bach) photovoltaic device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Back Amorphous-Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction (BACH) photovoltaic device integrates a range of high efficiency features while using low temperature (~200°C) fabrication processes. High efficiency features include back contact metallization, optimum interfacial passivation, and front-side and rear-side reflective coatings and scatterers for maximum light trapping. Two types of BACH cell prototypes were fabricated in this work with the best performing cell having an AM1.5G conversion efficiency of 8.1%, V <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">OC</sub> = 0.536 V, J <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SC</sub> = 20 mA/cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> and FF = 75.5%. Theoretically, the BACH solar cell concept has the potential of attaining energy conversion efficiencies in the 20 - 25% range. In this first set of cells, the BACH cell performance is limited by poor surface passivation and un-optimized cell design. Recent experiments with various passivation procedures has led to high minority carrier lifetimes in the ms range while carrying out the processes at low temperature, thus opening the way to higher efficiency BACH cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".