MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Broad‐scale satellite <scp>N</scp>ormalized <scp>D</scp>ifference <scp>V</scp>egetation <scp>I</scp>ndex data predict plant biomass and peak date of nitrogen concentration in <scp>A</scp>rctic tundra vegetation

2012· article· en· W2135686383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Vegetation Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité LavalCenter for Northern Studies
FundersArcticNet
KeywordsTundraNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexEnvironmental scienceGraminoidGrowing seasonBiomass (ecology)Vegetation (pathology)ArcticPhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesAgronomyGrasslandForbEcologyLeaf area indexGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Questions Is the satellite‐derived N ormalized D ifference V egetation I ndex ( NDVI ) an adequate proxy for the timing of the peak in plant nitrogen concentration in an A rctic tundra system? Can NDVI be used to reliably assess seasonal changes in aboveground plant biomass? Location The south plain of B ylot I sland, an A rctic tundra ecosystem north of B affin I sland, N unavut, C anada (73°08′ N , 80°00′ W ). Methods Using plant data collected every 2 wk throughout the summer in 1991, 1993–1996 and 2006–2008, we assessed the relationship between four NDVI indices ( AVHRR satellite data at 1‐km 2 spatial resolution) and the date of peak nitrogen concentration in wetland graminoid plants, which represents seasonal variability in plant quality. We also examined the relationship between NDVI and the seasonal changes in aboveground live plant biomass. Results Three out of the four NDVI metrics that we tested were significantly related to date of peak nitrogen concentration. The strongest relationship was found with the date at which NDVI values reached 50% of their annual maximum ( r 2 = 0.87). We also found a positive exponential relationship between NDVI and aboveground biomass of plants ( r 2 = 0.58), though this relationship was strongest early in the growing season. Conclusions NDVI can be used as a proxy to determine date of peak nitrogen concentration in some tundra plants, and can thus be a reliable measure of the yearly changes in the timing of the availability of high quality food for herbivores. To a lesser extent, NDVI can also be used to assess seasonal change in plant biomass. This study provides additional support for the use of broad‐scale satellite‐derived NDVI to assess seasonal changes in habitat quality for herbivores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it