MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135719853 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-37348

Influence of Hard Turning on Microstructure Evolution in the Subsurface Layers of Inconel 718

2014· article· en· W2135719853 on OpenAlexafffund
Heithem Touazine, M. Jahazi, P. Bocher

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au QuébecMcGill University
KeywordsInconelNanoindentationMaterials scienceMachiningMicrostructureSurface integrityResidual stressSurface roughnessCarbideMetallurgySurface finishSofteningComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the effects of semi finish, finish and critical finish machining parameters on the microstructural evolution of subsurface layers in Inconel 718. In order to assess the microstructural evolution in the subsurface layer following machining, advanced characterization methods including opto-digital microscopy, X-ray diffraction and nanoindentation were used. Results showed that friction between the tool and the workpiece during machining lead to microstructural changes such as hardness enhancement on the surface, and softening on the subsurface. It was also observed that damage in the machined surface is related to the presence of defects such as cracks, cavities and carbide detachment from the surface. Finally, residual stress measurements revealed that, within the investigated parameters, the cutting speed has the most significant effect on surface integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2A: Advanced ManufacturingSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207