MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135721627 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.059

Unusual presentation of an isolated unruptured aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva causing compression of the right ventricular outflow tract

2010· article· en· W2135721627 on OpenAlexaff
Cristian Rosu, Fadi Basile, Ignacio Priéto, Nicolas Noiseux

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsymptomaticVentricular outflow tractMedicineSinus (botany)AneurysmPresentation (obstetrics)OutflowCardiologySurgeryInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva is rare and usually asymptomatic unless rupture occurs. A 72-year-old man presented with exertional dyspnoea due to an unruptured aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva compressing the right ventricular outflow tract (Fig. 1 ). Successful elective surgical repair was undertaken (Fig. 2 ). Three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomographic scan demonstrating the aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva (ASV) with compression of the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract, under the pulmonary artery (PA). Intraoperative views and findings (A) showing the large aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva (ASV). The aneurysm appeared to have almost eroded into the right ventricle. Sutures have been placed into the right coronary cusp portion of the aortic valve annulus to reconstruct the proximal aortic root with a Dacron patch. (B) The Dacron patch was secured to the annulus and to the aorta. The right coronary artery will be re-implanted onto the Dacron patch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207