MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135743623 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2008.90

Spectral Regrowth Reduction for Digital Audio Broadcasting Using EER Amplifiers

2008· article· en· W2135743623 on OpenAlexaff
B. Walker, Jacek Ilow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDigital audio broadcastingAmplifierElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)Amplitude modulationOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFrequency modulationTelecommunicationsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the amplitude modulation (AM) radio broadcast band, there are several standards being considered for digital audio broadcast (DAB), all using orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM). One of the main challenges to implementing digital audio broadcasting is that existing broadcast equipment was not designed for it. Unlike analog AM, which is a low bandwidth amplitude modulated signal, OFDM is a noise-like signal with significant amplitude and phase modulation. Most AM transmitters use an envelope elimination and restoration (EER) amplifier architecture, where the amplitude and phase components of the signal are amplified separately then recombined at the high power stage. The magnitude and phase component bandwidths are several times that of the input signal, and any filtering in the amplifier will result in spectral regrowth due to poor cancellation of this high frequency content. This paper develops the concept of using time-domain preprocessing on the signal to reduce the bandwidth expansion in EER amplifiers. The processing exploits the localization of the bandwidth expansion and its correlation with spectral regrowth at the output. The proposed algorithm identifies distortion- causing signal sections and replaces each one with an alternative signal trajectory. Using the processing, out of band emissions are reduced at the expense of increased computational complexity and error vector magnitude. Promising results are shown for the DRM 10 kHz digital signal, with reductions in spectral regrowth of up to 10 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207