MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135775114

Stabilization of glucose oxidase with cyclodextrin-branched carboxymethylcellulose

2012· article· en· W2135775114 on OpenAlexaff
Madyu Matos, Benjamin K. Simpson, Héctor L. Ramírez, Rong Cao, Juan J. Torres‐Labandeira, Karel Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucose oxidaseChemistryThermostabilityCyclodextrinCarbodiimidePulmonary surfactantCovalent bondDerivatizationEnzymeChromatographyNuclear chemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistryHigh-performance liquid chromatography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a methodology for improving some enzymatic characteristics of glucose oxidase (GOx) (EC 1.1.3.4). The enzyme was chemically modified with a ß-cyclodextrin-branched carboxymethylcellulose polymer (CMC-CD), using carbodiimide as coupling agent. The obtained neoglycoenzyme had 0.78 mol of polysaccharide per mol of GOx and retained 67% of its initial activity. Comparison of some characteristics of the modified and free enzymes showed a higher Km for derivatized GOx and better thermostability, which increased from 45 °C to 51 °C. In addition, derivatization of GOx with CMC-CD increased its resistance to inactivation at 45 °C by 2.2-fold, protected the molecule against inactivation with the anionic surfactant sodium dodecylsulphate to the point that it retained 75% of its activity after an incubation of 3 h, and extended its pH tolerance toward alkaline pH (7.5). Covalent glycosidation of glucose oxidase with CD-branched carboxymethylcellulose polymer constitutes therefore an effective strategy for enhancing the stability of this enzyme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207