MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135790421 · doi:10.7451/cbe.2013.55.3.11

Drying characteristics of forage sorghum stalks

2013· article· en· W2135790421 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Timothy J. Rennie, Donald G. Mercer, A. Tubeileh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Biosystems Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorghumForageAgronomyAgricultural engineeringEnvironmental scienceBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forage sorghum has been identified as a potential source of biomass for heating by direct combustion. An important aspect of the production system is crop drying prior to storage or processing, such as pelletizing. In order to properly evaluate the effects of maceration or other similar treatments on the field drying of sorghum, a baseline of the drying characteristics of sorghum needs to be established. This was accomplished by drying samples of sorghum stalks in an Armfield UOP8 laboratory-scale tray dryer at an air temperature of 50°C and air velocity of 0.5 m/s. Stalks were cut into either 200 mm or 50 mm lengths. For some of the 200 mm lengths, the ends were sealed in paraffin wax to duplicate infinite cylinders so that the drying characteristics of the waxy skin could be determined separately from the cut ends. The data was fit to several standard exponential type models, including a two-term Newton model, and a separation of variables model based on Fick’s law. The length of the stalk and the sealing of the ends significantly affected the drying rate. Statistical indicators demonstrated that standard exponential models adequately capture the drying curves and are on par with the separation of variables model. The two-term Newton model and the separation of variables model provided a distinction between the axial and radial moisture migration. Using the separation of variables model, the effective diffusivity of sorghum stalks was determined to be 4.17 x 10-8 and 8.81 x 10-6 m2/hr in the radial and axial directions, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.144
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Biosystems EngineeringSame topicFood Drying and ModelingFrench-language works237,207