Xenogeneic milieu markedly remodels endocrine cell populations after transplantation of fish islets into streptozotocin‐diabetic nude mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is unknown whether irrelevant foreign endocrine products secreted by xenografts would be biologically active and potentially harmful to recipients; even if entirely inert, continuous production might result in harmful circulating antigen-antibody complexes. We examined the fate of such a product using a fish (tilapia)-to-mouse islet xenograft model. Teleost fish islets, like mammalian islets, are composed primarily of cells producing insulin, glucagon or somatostatin; however, teleost fish have two different populations of somatostatin (SST) producing delta cells, one producing SST-14, a 14 amino acid SST identical to mammalian SST, which is derived from the pre-proSST-I gene which is present in all vertebrates, and the other a "large" (i.e. 22 to 28 amino acid) SST derived from a pre-proSST-II gene, which is not found in mammals. In contrast to 'large' SST, which has no mammalian homolog, teleost fish insulins, glucagons and SST-14 exhibit significant biological activity in mammals. Tilapia islets were transplanted under the kidney capsules of streptozotocin-diabetic nude mice, and mice with functioning grafts were killed at various times after transplantation. Serial sections of graft-bearing kidneys were stained by immunoperoxidase for insulin, SST-14, SST-25 and glucagon positive cells, and the areas of each cell type in the graft were measured using image analysis. Sections of untransplanted tilapia islets (both in situ and after harvest/culture) were also immunostained and measured as controls. Xenotransplantation of fish islets into diabetic nude mice resulted in the rapid degeneration and near total loss of SST-25+ cells, as well as a marked redistribution of the proportions of the remaining endocrine cell types. The proportions of cell types in the grafts gradually changed from a piscine pattern to that of mammalian islets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".