Characterization of folate-dependent enzymes and indices of folate status in laying hens supplemented with folic acid or 5-methyltetrahydrofolate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conversion of folic acid (FA) to the biologically active 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) is necessary for the deposition of folate in the egg. A study was conducted to compare egg folate concentrations, indices of folate status, and activities of folate-dependent enzymes in response to equimolar intake of either FA or 5-MTHF in laying hens. Forty-eight laying hens, 24 wk of age, from 2 different strains (Shaver White and Shaver Brown) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 (n = 8 per strain) dietary treatments: 1) basal diet with no supplemental folate, 2) basal diet + 10 mg/kg of FA, or 3) basal diet + 11.3 mg/kg of 5-MTHF for 3 wk. A completely randomized design with 3 dietary treatments and 2 laying hen strains in a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement was used. Data were subjected to ANOVA, using the PROC GLM procedure of SAS. Plasma homocysteine, serum, and egg folate concentrations; hepatic serine hydroxymethyltransferase; and methionine synthase activity were affected by dietary folate supplementation but not by its form (FA and 5-MTHF). Relative to control hens, plasma homocysteine was decreased (P < 0.05) by 14.2%, whereas serum and egg folate were increased (P < 0.05) by 78.3 and 61.8%, respectively, in hens consuming either folate compound. Hepatic serine hydroxymethyltransferase and methionine synthase activity were increased and decreased (P < 0.05), respectively, in folate-fed birds compared with control-fed birds. Hepatic dihydrofolate reductase was influenced by both the addition and form of dietary folate, being higher (P < 0.05) in FA-fed birds than in 5-MTHF and control-fed birds. Feed efficiency was improved (P < 0.05) in 5-MTHF-fed birds relative to FA-fed birds. Strain of hen influenced serum folate and plasma homocysteine concentrations but not other indices of folate metabolism. Overall, FA and 5-MTHF have equivalent effects in enhancing egg folate concentrations and improving folate status in laying hens. Also, supplementation and form of folate may modulate the activity of folate-dependent enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".