MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135869554 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4650019

Angular Domain Optical Imaging using a micromachined tunnel array and a Keplerian lens system

2008· article· en· W2135869554 on OpenAlexaff
Fartash Vasefi, Bożena Kamińska, Glenn H. Chapman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsPhotonAngular resolution (graph drawing)Lens (geology)CuvetteTraverseAzimuthScatteringDiffractionTotal internal reflectionWavelengthAcceptance angleImage resolutionPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)Materials scienceComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angular Domain Imaging (ADI) is a technique that selects quasi-ballistic photons exiting from a highly scattering medium by an array of silicon micromachined micro-tunnels. Each channel has a limited acceptance angle based on its geometry therefore those photons that traverse within the acceptance angle of the micro-tunnels will be detected by the imager. In this paper, the ADI technique has been investigated by using newly micromachined tunnels with less spacing between the channels. Also, a Keplerian lens system is used to remove the diffracted light exiting from the tunnels that results due to internal reflection of scattered photons along the tunnel's walls. With these changes, improvements in the spatial resolution including sharper edges and definition were observed. The experiments show that the new setup can resolve test structure objects down to 100 mum embedded midway through a 2 cm long cuvette filled with 0.3% Intralipid solution in the 808 nm wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207