Packet loss recovery codes based on Vandermonde matrices and shift operators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An increasing number of real-time applications in packet networks uses erasure codes to cope with packet losses. Most of these codes were designed originally for bit or symbol oriented transmission. This paper introduces packet oriented block codes for the recovery of lost packets. Specifically, a family of systematic erasure codes is proposed based on the Vandermonde matrix applied to a group of k information packets to construct r redundant packets. The elements of the Vandermonde matrix are bit level right arithmetic shift operators applied to the information packets. With low-overhead packet padding, the code design is applicable to packets of any size with the same lengths within the block of k information packets. The recovery of lost packets is based on inverting a matrix corresponding to the coefficient -Vandermonde- matrix augmented by the identity matrix with the rows removed according to the sequence number of the lost packets. The general code design principles are illustrated in this paper with examples of codes of different parameters. Erasure recovery capability of the proposed codes is characterized by simple decoding procedures. The code designs are tested using Monte Carlo simulations and their performance shows good agreement with theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".