Website Design and Usage Behaviour: An Application of the UTAUT Model for Internet Banking in UK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A well designed website brings numerous benefits to firms. Some of these benefits are well established. But whatelements of the website design really matter and how do these in turn influence website usage behaviour?Adopting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as the theoretical foundation, wereport the findings from a survey of 316 users of internet banking; data were collected through an offlinequestionnaire developed based on the literature review and previous studies,directed to a convenience sample.Structure equation modelling, the two steps approach, starting with measurement model and then the structuralmodel was applied.We demonstrate that the technical, general content and appearance dimensions of a Web siteare the most important for users. In addition, these dimensions are significantly related to usage behaviourdirectly and indirectly through belief constructs. We also find that the impact of performance expectancy onusage behaviouris significant in predicting usage. Implications and Recommendationswere provided afterthorough discussion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".