MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135881369 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.1991.147006

A new finite-difference time-domain formulation equivalent to the TLM symmetrical condensed node

2002· article· en· W2135881369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNode (physics)Transmission lineTopology (electrical circuits)Dispersion (optics)Resolution (logic)Finite difference methodTransmission (telecommunications)Equivalent circuitDomain (mathematical analysis)MathematicsTime domainField (mathematics)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsAlgorithmPhysicsComputer sciencePure mathematicsCombinatoricsVoltageOpticsQuantum mechanicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A finite-difference-time-domain (FD-TD) formulation is shown to be exactly equivalent to the symmetrical condensed node model used in the transmission line matrix (TLM) method. The proposed FD-TD formulation results in a kind of condensed model where both electric and magnetic field components are defined at the center of a unit cell and at mid-points between adjacent nodes. Due to a better field resolution and fulfillment of continuity conditions, the FD-TD formulation or its TLM equivalent model is shown to have less dispersion and better accuracy than the traditional FD-TD method based on K.S. Yee's (1966) scheme.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it