Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question des conjugalités des Français descendants d’immigrés suscite un intérêt nouveau en raison de la constitution d’un marché matrimonial en France et de la persistance de la norme de l’endogamie. À partir des données d’une enquête par entretiens biographiques menée en 2007 auprès d’une centaine de personnes d’origine maghrébine, turque ou africaine sub-saharienne, l’article se propose d’examiner la tension entre les préoccupations d’endogamie et d’homogamie. Ce faisant, les auteurs proposent le concept « homogamie socio-ethnique » permettant de tenir compte simultanément des dimensions culturelles, sociales et sexuées qui interviennent dans le choix conjugal des descendants d’immigrés. Les sphères de la socialisation pré-conjugale et les variations autour de la norme d’endogamie lors de la mise en couple donnent lieu à une analyse empirique approfondie. La réflexion engagée invite à une compréhension du processus d’élaboration conjugale qui, sous l’effet des logiques internes et des pressions externes, aboutit à une réinterprétation de l’endogamie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".