In-vivo ovarian androgen responses to recombinant FSH with and without recombinant LH in polycystic ovarian syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Effects of exogenous LH on ovarian androgen secretion during ovulation induction have not been clearly characterized in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The purpose of this study was to compare androgen secretion in PCOS women during ovarian stimulation with either recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone or combined with recombinant LH (rLH). METHODS: Clomiphene-resistant women with PCOS were allocated, in a factorial study design, to receive either daily injections of rFSH (n = 24) or rFSH + rLH (n = 24) in a 1:1 ratio starting: (i) on day 2-3 of progestogen-induced menses (n = 8); (ii) after 6 weeks of GnRH agonist treatment (nafarelin, 400 micro g twice daily; n = 8); or (iii) after nafarelin treatment as in (ii) plus dexamethasone (n = 8). The effects of rFSH with rFSH + rLH under these three hormone conditions on serum LH, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), androstenedione (DeltaDelta(4)) and testosterone were contrasted by analysis of variance with specific treatment days as a repeated measures factor. RESULTS: Pre-study hormone levels were similar for all groupings. Nafarelin significantly suppressed LH levels, which remained at the lower limit of assay sensitivity (0.5 IU/l) during stimulation with rFSH but increased significantly to >1 but <2 IU/l when rLH was added. As expected, 17-OHP, DeltaDelta(4) and testosterone levels fell following nafarelin treatment. Dexamethasone further suppressed 17-OHP, DeltaDelta(4) and testosterone levels and unmasked a small but significant rise in these ovarian steroids 24 h following the first dose of rFSH + rLH, a rise that was absent with rFSH alone. Secretion of these steroids then appeared to 'catch-up' after 5 days of rFSH stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite profound LH, 17-OHP, DeltaDelta(4) and testosterone suppression, comparable E(2) response, follicle development and successful pregnancies in PCOS subjects receiving rFSH alone to those receiving rFSH + rLH would argue that circulating LH at levels as low as 0.5 IU/l are sufficient to sustain adequate follicle development and function when FSH is present in abundance. Whether the observed dichotomy between rFSH and rFSH + rLH treatment in temporal secretion patterns reflects a greater reliance on evolving paracrine mechanisms as the follicles mature under profound LH suppression remains to be explored but may influence the optimal LH threshold for ovulation induction in PCOS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".