IIR Digital Filter Design With New Stability Constraint Based on Argument Principle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a weighted least squares (WLS) method for IIR digital filter design using a new stability constraint. Utilizing the reweighting technique, an iterative second-order cone programming (SOCP) method is employed to solve the design problem, such that either linear or second-order cone constraints can be further incorporated. In order to guarantee the stability of designed IIR digital filters, a new stability constraint with a prescribed pole radius is derived from the argument principle (AP) of complex analysis. As compared with other frequency-domain stability constraints, the AP-based stability constraint is both sufficient and necessary. Since the derived stability constraint cannot be directly incorporated in the iterative SOCP method, the similar reweighting technique is deployed to approximate the stability constraint in a quadratic form, which is then combined with the WLS iterative design process. Filter design examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed iterative SOCP method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it