MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135953901 · doi:10.1139/w03-001

Water activity, temperature, and pH effects on growth of the biocontrol agent<i>Pantoea agglomerans</i>CPA-2

2002· article· en· W2135953901 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
E. Costa, J. Usall, Neus Teixidó, Josué Delgado, İnmaculada Viñas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPantoea agglomeransGlycerolBacterial growthWater activitySucroseYeast extractFood sciencePostharvestBiological pest controlChemistryBacteriaBiologyBotanyBiochemistryFermentationWater content

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growth response of the biocontrol agent Pantoea agglomerans to changes in water activity (a(w)), temperature, and pH was determined in vitro in nutrient yeast extract-sucrose medium. The minimum temperature at which P. agglomerans was able to grow was 267-272 kelvins (-6 to -1 degrees C), and growth of P. agglomerans did not change at varying pH levels (4.5-8.6). The minimum a(w) for growth was 0.96 in media modified with glycerol and 0.95 in media modified with NaCl or glucose. Solute used to reduce water activity had a great influence on bacterial growth, especially at unfavourable conditions (e.g., low pH or temperature). NaCl stimulated bacterial growth under optimum temperatures but inhibited it under unfavourable pH conditions (4.5 or 8.6). In contrast, the presence of glucose in the medium allowed P. agglomerans to grow over a broad range of temperature (3-42 degrees C) or pH (5-8.6) regimes. This study has defined the range of environmental conditions (a(w), pH, and temperature) over which the bacteria may be developed for biological control of postharvest diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyFrench-language works237,207