MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135963291 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2006.1696401

Cooperative Caching with Adaptive Prefetching in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

2006· article· en· W2135963291 on OpenAlexaff
Mieso K. Denko, Jun Tian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstruction prefetchComputer scienceCacheMobile ad hoc networkConsistency (knowledge bases)Computer networkOverhead (engineering)Scheme (mathematics)Wireless ad hoc networkCPU cacheFalse sharingDistributed computingCache algorithmsWirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a cooperative data caching and prefetching scheme for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). In this scheme, multiple hosts cooperate in prefetching and caching data. Clustering architecture was used for network organization. A weak consistency based on time to live value was used to maintain data consistency. A hybrid cache replacement policy that uses the frequency of access and reference time was employed. The effects of various parameter settings on the performance metrics such as data accessibility, query delay and network traffic overhead were investigated in a simulation environment. The proposed integrated cooperative caching and prefetching scheme was compared with cooperative caching without prefetching. The simulation results indicate that the proposed scheme improves both data accessibility and query delay at relatively lower prefetch thresholds and larger cache sizes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207