MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135970763 · doi:10.7202/010712ar

La contribution des personnes vivant avec le VIH-sida au renouvellement de la prévention1

2005· article· fr· W2135970763 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Isabelle Lafleur, Germain Trottier, Jocelyn Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)ArtMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur les stratégies préventives utilisées par 84 femmes et hommes séropositifs. Son originalité est qu’il revoit la prévention à partir des concepts de l’interactionnisme symbolique s’intéressant à la sexualité et des principes de l’autodétermination et de la dialectique personne/environnement. Les résultats de la recherche révèlent que les stratégies préventives s’articulent à travers une diversité de pratiques et de situations. De plus, les concepts utilisés peuvent contribuer au renouvellement de la prévention dans le domaine du VIH-sida. Cela est d’autant plus pertinent que cette problématique, actuellement moins médiatisée, demeure toujours aussi présente dans le quotidien des personnes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207