MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135992844 · doi:10.1017/s0022112002001441

An electrokinetic model of drop deformation in an electric field

2002· article· en· W2135992844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrokinetic phenomenaElectric fieldDrop (telecommunication)ThermodynamicsMechanicsMaterials scienceDielectricCharge carrierCompressibilityPhysicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electrokinetic model is proposed to describe a slight drop deformation which is induced by a weak external electric field. The fluids forming the system are considered Newtonian incompressible dielectric liquids containing free electric charge carriers. According to the model, the charge carriers take part in migration, diffusion and convection transport and there is no solute adsorption at the interface. Thermodynamic quasi-equilibrium at the interface is assumed for the charge carriers in the contacting liquids. The interfacial thermodynamic equilibrium is described using a common distribution coefficient for all the carriers. The problem is simplified by assuming equal diffusion coefficients for the different charge carriers within the same liquid. An analytical expression is obtained for slight drop deformation which is proportional to the second power of the applied field strength magnitude. The expression derived represents the drop deformation as a function of the parameters employed in previous theories (O’Konski & Thacher 1953; Allan & Mason 1962; Taylor 1966) as well as two additional parameters. The additional parameters are the ratios of the drop radius to the Debye lengths of the outer and inner liquids, respectively. The expression obtained for the drop deformation is valid for arbitrary values of these parameters. According to the theory prediction, with an increase in the drop radius, the drop deformation monotonically changes from that obtained by O’Konski & Thacher (1953) and Allan & Mason (1962) for perfect dielectric liquids to that obtained by Taylor (1966) for leaky dielectric liquids. Two simplified versions of the general expression are suggested to describe particular cases of a conducting drop in a perfect dielectric liquid and of a perfect dielectric drop in a conducting liquid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it