MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136004719 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2006.1683491

A performance modeling of connectivity in ad hoc networks

2006· article· en· W2136004719 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Ali, Mehdi Khabazian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless ad hoc networkComputer networkComputer scienceNode (physics)PopulationPoisson distributionMobile ad hoc networkMobility modelService (business)Optimized Link State Routing ProtocolAd hoc wireless distribution serviceDistributed computingTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatisticsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the connectivity of an ad hoc network with a dynamic user population. We assume that the nodes arrive at the service area according to a Poisson process and, then travel according to a user mobility model. The nodes, which have not departed the service area, are able to participate in communications. The location of the nodes and the size of the user population within the service area are constantly changing. We study connectivity of this user population at the steady-state. We derive the distribution of the size of user population within the service area, node's location distribution and the distribution of the distance between the two nodes. Then, we determine the mean cluster size, fraction of nodes within the cluster, probability that nodes will form a single cluster and average of the minimum number of hops that it takes for two nodes to communicate. This work shows significance of mobility on the connectivity of ad hoc networks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207