Radio-Frequency Current Density Imaging Based on a 180$^\circ$ Sample Rotation With Feasibility Study of Full Current Density Vector Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radio-frequency current density imaging (RF-CDI) is a technique that noninvasively measures current density distributions at the Larmor frequency utilizing magnetic resonance imaging. Previously implemented RF-CDI methods reconstruct the applied current density component J(z) along the static magnetic field of the imager [(B)\vec](0) (the z direction) based on the assumption that the z-directional change of the magnetic field component H(z) can be ignored compared to J(z). However, this condition may be easily violated in biomedical applications. We propose a new reconstruction method for RF-CDI, which does not rely on the aforementioned assumption. Instead, the sample is rotated by 180 (°) in the horizontal plane to collect magnetic resonance data from two opposite positions. Using simulations and experiments, we have verified that this approach can fully recover one component of current density. Furthermore, this approach can be extended to measure three dimensional current density vectors by one additional sample orientation in the horizontal plane. We have therefore demonstrated for the first time the feasibility of imaging the magnitude and phase of all components of a radio-frequency current density vector field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".