MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136045344 · doi:10.1189/jlb.0111007

Complementary and contrasting roles of NK cells and T cells in pediatric umbilical cord blood transplantation

2011· review· en· W2136045344 on OpenAlexafffund
Natacha Mérindol, Emily Charrier, Michel Duval, Hugo Soudeyns

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leukocyte Biology · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCentre de recherche du CHU Sainte-JustineCole Foundation
KeywordsContext (archaeology)BiologyImmunologyImmune systemUmbilical Cord Blood TransplantationUmbilical cordTransplantationCancer researchMedicineAntigenInternal medicineHuman leukocyte antigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UCBT has been used for almost 25 years to treat a variety of malignant and nonmalignant childhood diseases. The biological properties of NK cells and T cells and their implication in engraftment, immune reconstitution, OIs, leukemic relapse, and GvHD have been explored in the context of UCBT. These studies have established that lymphocytes have a major impact on the outcome of UCBT and that NK cells and T cells play complementary and contrasting roles in immune reconstitution and the GvL effect. Therefore, novel strategies to improve the outcome of UCBT recipients, including immunotherapeutic regimens, should be based on key immunologic features of UCB T lymphocytes and NK cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leukocyte BiologySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207